Research

Intimate partner violence in early adolescence: The role of gender, socioeconomic factors and the school
Abstract
Background. Intimate partner violence (IPV) among adolescents is common worldwide, but our understanding of perpetration, gender differences and the role of social-ecological factors remains limited.
Objectives. To explore the prevalence of physical and sexual IPV perpetration and victimisation by gender, and associated risk and protective factors.
Methods. Young adolescents (N=2 839) from 41 randomly selected public high schools in the Western Cape region of South Africa (SA), participating in the PREPARE study, completed a self-administered questionnaire.
Results. The participants’ mean age was 13.65 years (standard deviation 1.01), with 19.1% (541/2 839) reporting being victims/survivors of IPV and 13.0% (370/2 839) reporting perpetrating IPV. Girls were less likely to report being a victim/survivor of physical IPV (odds ratio (OR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 - 0.92) and less likely to be a perpetrator of sexual IPV than boys (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.21 - 0.52). Factors associated with perpetration of physical and sexual IPV were similar and included being a victim/survivor (physical IPV: OR 12.42; 95% CI 8.89 - 17.36, sexual IPV: OR 20.76; 95% CI 11.67 - 36.93), being older (physical IPV: OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.08 - 1.47, sexual IPV: OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.14 - 1.62 ), having lower scores on school connectedness (physical IPV: OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46 - 0.75, sexual IPV: OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.42 - 0.76) and scoring lower on feelings of school safety (physical IPV: OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57 - 0.77, sexual IPV: OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.40 - 0.62).
Conclusions. Physical and sexual IPV was commonly reported among young adolescents in SA. Further qualitative exploration of the role of reciprocal violence by gender is needed, and the role of ‘school climate’-related factors should be taken into account when developing preventive interventions.Authors' affiliations
Amanda J Mason-Jones, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK; Adolescent Health Research Unit, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Petra De Koker, Adolescent Health Research Unit, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa; International Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
Sander Matthijs Eggers, Department of Health Promotion, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Netherlands
Catherine Mathews, Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Adolescent Health Research Unit, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Marleen Temmerman, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium; Center of Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
Els Leye, International Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
Petrus J de Vries, Adolescent Health Research Unit, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Hein de Vries, Department of Health Promotion, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Netherlands
Full Text

Keywords
Cite this article
Article History
Date published: 2016-03-31
Article Views
Full text views: 1930
Comments on this article
*Read our policy for posting comments here