Temperature regulation in emergency, surgical and critical care
To the Editor: Recently it was brought to the
attention the Trauma Society of South Africa (SA) and the
Emergency Medicine Society of SA that a certain unnamed
medical scheme has produced a document that limits the use of
patient warming devices in the care of people covered by that
particular funder (Table 1).
Table 1. Policy for patient warming devices from unnamed medical scheme |
Blankets: Warm air – disposable |
100% chargeable when patient complies with the following criteria: Infant or paediatric cases (<14 years old) • with a theatre time ≥60 min and/or • neurosurgery, i.e. brain surgery and spinal surgery, with a theatre time ≥60 min and/or • orthopaedic surgery to major hip joints (hip, knee, shoulder, ankle and elbow), with a theatre time ≥60 min and/or • cardiothoracic and cardiovascular surgery, with a theatre time ≥60 min and/or • major abdominal surgery for splenectomy and correction of congenital abnormalities, with a theatre time ≥60 min and/or • post-traumatic hypothermia for cases treated in the emergency room, if required, proof of hypothermia to be supplied to medical aid. |
Adult cases • patients ≥65 years old and with a theatre time ≥90 min and/or • neurosurgery, i.e brain surgery and spinal surgery, with a theatre time ≥90 min and/or • orthopaedic surgery to major hip joints (hip, knee, shoulder, ankle and elbow), with a theatre time ≥90 min and/or • cardiothoracic and cardiovascular surgery, with a theatre time ≥90 min and irrespective of age • major abdominal surgery, i.e abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, Whipple procedure, splenectomy with a theatre time ≥90 min and/or • post-traumatic hypothermia for cases treated in the emergency room, if required, proof of hypothermia to be supplied to medical aid. |
We, as senior representatives of a number of relevant professional societies, are concerned that the recommendations of this funder will be adopted by other funders and that this will place patients at risk of increased morbidity and even potential mortality, since it is well known from recent literature that maintenance of a core temperature of around 36.5°C is associated with improved outcomes.
More importantly, we have
noted that temperature regulation is inadequately addressed in
the National Core Standards and therefore with these two
issues at hand we decided to undertake a literature review and
propose a best-practice guideline to enable clinically
relevant indications for the use of temperature regulation
practices and devices. The resultant review article1 is published in this issue of
the SAMJ so as to effectively
disseminate the important information about this issue to
South African healthcare practitioners.
President of the Trauma Society of South Africa; and Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
hardcastle@ukzn.ac.za
President of the
Emergency Medicine Society of SA; and Division of Emergency
Medicine, Stellenbosch and Cape Town universities, Cape Town,
South Africa
Chief Anaesthesiologist,
Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa;
and Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of
KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
SA Society of
Anaesthesia; and Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care,
University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
KwaZulu-Natal Chairperson
of the Critical Care Society of SA; and Department of
Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of KwaZulu-Natal,
Durban, South Africa
1. Hardcastle TC, Stander M, Kalafatis N, Hodgson RE, Gopalan D. External patient temperature control in emergency centres, trauma centres, intensive care units and operating theatres: A multi-society literature review. S Afr Med J 2013;103(9):609-611. [http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.7327]
S Afr Med
J 2013;103(9):598.
DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.7326
Article Views
Full text views: 5440
Comments on this article
*Read our policy for posting comments here