Izindaba

PinkDrive intervention ‘over-rated’ – experts
Abstract
Breast health professionals are questioning the life-saving impact of the high profile non-profit breast cancer organisation PinkDrive. But PinkDrive founder Noelene Kotschan has roundly rejected the attack.
The multi-disciplinary Breast Interest Group of South Africa (BIGOSA) claims PinkDrive has been forced to stop its mammographic screening activities – which Izindaba showcased as temporarily eliminating public sector mammography backlogs in our December issue[1] – due to poor imaging and interpretation as well as failure to provide work-up for positive findings. The group, a multi-disciplinary national collective of medical professionals linked to breast health, further claims that PinkDrive violated multiple scientifically sound principles and failed to operate under ‘any kind of scientific scrutiny’.
The multi-disciplinary Breast Interest Group of South Africa (BIGOSA) claims PinkDrive has been forced to stop its mammographic screening activities – which Izindaba showcased as temporarily eliminating public sector mammography backlogs in our December issue[1] – due to poor imaging and interpretation as well as failure to provide work-up for positive findings. The group, a multi-disciplinary national collective of medical professionals linked to breast health, further claims that PinkDrive violated multiple scientifically sound principles and failed to operate under ‘any kind of scientific scrutiny’.
Author's affiliations
Chris Bateman, HMPG
Keywords
Pink Drive, Mammography, breast cancer
Cite this article
South African Medical Journal 2013;103(3):136-137.
DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.6753
Article History
Date submitted: 2013-01-31
Date published: 2013-02-21
Date published: 2013-02-21
Article Views
Abstract views: 2215
Full text views: 2333
Full text views: 2333
Comments on this article
*Read our policy for posting comments here