Forum

Interference with the clinical independence of doctors in hospitals faced with a shortage of resources: What should doctors do?

David Jan McQuoid-Mason

Abstract


In the face of interference with their clinical independence in hospitals with a shortage of resources, what should doctors do? The question can be answered by considering: (i) the constitutional right to healthcare and emergency treatment; (ii) the common-law position regarding unlawful homicide and the doctrine of ‘superior orders’; (iii) the ethical rules of the Health Professions Council of South Africa; and (iv) whether there is any protection for doctors who refuse to carry out unprofessional, unethical or unlawful directives from their superiors. While this article focuses on the public sector, some of the legal principles, where relevant, apply equally to doctors in the private sector.


Author's affiliations

David Jan McQuoid-Mason, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (564KB) HTML

Keywords

Political interference; Clinical independence; ICU; Futile treatment; Superior orders; Reporting duties

Cite this article

South African Medical Journal 2014;104(11):741-742. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.8868

Article History

Date submitted: 2014-08-26
Date published: 2014-09-21

Article Views

Abstract views: 2388
Full text views: 3049

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here