Izindaba

BHF ‘upset but undeterred’ by Appeal Court ruling

Chris Bateman

Abstract


Until the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) comes up with acceptable tariff guidelines or the courts definitively rule on the validity of regulations governing prescribed minimum benefits (PMBs), internecine warfare in the healthcare industry is set to continue.
That is the effect of last month’s dismissal by the Supreme Court of Appeals (SCA) of an application by the Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) to have declared invalid a year-old finding by the High Court in Pretoria. In November last year, Judge Cynthia Pretorius found that the BHF had no locus standi1 to ask for a ruling on the correct interpretation of Regulation 8 of the Medical Schemes Act.

Author's affiliations

Chris Bateman, HMPG

Full Text

PDF (101KB) HTML

Keywords

Prescribed Minimum Benefits, Tariff guidelines

Cite this article

South African Medical Journal 2012;102(11):819-820. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.6359

Article History

Date submitted: 2012-10-01
Date published: 2012-10-26

Article Views

Abstract views: 1084
Full text views: 2306

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here