In Practice

The impact of HIV infection on the presentation of lung cancer in South Africa

C F N Koegelenberg, T van der Made, J J Taljaard, E M Irusen

Abstract


Background. Despite the very high background prevalence of HIV and smoking-related diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, very little is known about the presentation of lung cancer in HIV-infected individuals.

Methods. We prospectively compared HIV-positive (n=44) and HIV-negative lung cancer patients (n=425) with regard to demographics, cell type, performance status and umour node metastasis staging at initial presentation.

Results. HIV-positive patients were found to be younger than HIV-negative (mean 54.1 (standard deviation (SD) 8.4) years v. 60.5 (10) years, p<0.01), more likely to have squamous cell carcinoma (43.2% v. 30.1%, p=0.07) and significantly more likely to have a poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≥3 (47.7% v. 29.4%, p=0.02). In the case of non-small cell-lung cancer, they were also significantly less likely to have early stage lung cancer (0% v. 10.3%, p=0.02) compared with HIV-negative patients.

Conclusions. HIV-positive lung cancer patients were younger, significantly more likely to have a poor performance status at presentation and significantly less likely to have early stage lung cancer when compared with HIV-negative patients.


Authors' affiliations

C F N Koegelenberg, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

T van der Made, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

J J Taljaard, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

E M Irusen, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

Full Text

PDF (71KB)

Keywords

AIDS; HIV; Lung cancer

Cite this article

South African Medical Journal 2016;106(7):666-668. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i7.10737

Article History

Date submitted: 2016-03-03
Date published: 2016-06-17

Article Views

Abstract views: 726
Full text views: 269

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here