Research

Prenatal BoBsTM in the cytogenetic analysis of products of spontaneous miscarriage

Sarah Mellali, Khadidja Haoud, Laetitia Gouas, Meghit Boumediene Khaled, Philippe Vago, Soraya Moulessehoul

Abstract


Background. Fifty percent of spontaneous miscarriages (SMs) are attributed to chromosomal abnormalities. Cytogenetic analysis is an important tool for patient counselling and assessment of the risk of recurrence in future pregnancies. Conventional karyotyping has been the gold standard for chromosomal investigation of products of conception (POC), but it has limitations due to sample maceration, culture failure and maternal cell contamination. Molecular cytogenetic approaches have therefore been developed and found valuable in the cytogenetic investigation of these samples. The Prenatal BoBsTM and KaryoLite BoBsTM, based on the newly developed BACs-on-BeadsTM technology, have been described as reliable tests for rapid detection of aneuploidies in prenatal and POC samples, respectively.

Objective. To describe our clinical experience of routine screening of POC samples with Prenatal BoBsTM, the test used by our laboratory in France.

Methods. Seventeen samples collected at the University Hospital of Sidi Bel Abbès (Western Algeria) and a further 60 from the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (France) were analysed (19 chorionic villi from products of curettage, 12 placentas, 9 amniotic cells and 37 biopsy specimens). All were screened for the frequent aneuploidies (chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y) in addition to nine microdeletion/microduplication syndrome regions by Prenatal BoBsTM. Standard karyotyping was performed on 51 samples, but failed in 38 cases.

Results. Prenatal BoBsTM identified one trisomy 21 and one deletion of 17p13.3. Furthermore, it provided a conclusive result in cases of culture failure (n=38) and in samples with macerated tissue (n=19). The overall failure rate was 11.4%.

Conclusions. Prenatal BoBsTM is a promising technology that represents a fast, sensitive and robust alternative to routine screening for chromosomal abnormality in products of SM. Furthermore, it overcomes the limitations of conventional karyotyping and current molecular cytogenetic techniques.

Authors' affiliations

Sarah Mellali, Laboratoire de biotoxicologie, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University, Algeria; Faculty of Life and Natural Science, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria

Khadidja Haoud, Laboratoire de biotoxicologie, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University, Algeria; UFR médecine, cytologie, histologie, embryologie cytogénétique, université Clermont 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Service de cytogénétique médicale, CHU d’Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France; ERTICA EA4677, UFR médecine, université Clermont 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Faculty of Life and Natural Science, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria

Laetitia Gouas, UFR médecine, cytologie, histologie, embryologie cytogénétique, université Clermont 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Service de cytogénétique médicale, CHU d’Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France; ERTICA EA4677, UFR médecine, université Clermont 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Meghit Boumediene Khaled, Faculty of Life and Natural Science, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria

Philippe Vago, UFR médecine, cytologie, histologie, embryologie cytogénétique, université Clermont 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Service de cytogénétique médicale, CHU d’Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France; ERTICA EA4677, UFR médecine, université Clermont 1, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Soraya Moulessehoul, Laboratoire de biotoxicologie, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University, Algeria; Faculty of Life and Natural Science, Department of Biology, Djillali Liabes University of Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria

Full Text

PDF (219KB)

Keywords

Spontaneous miscarriage; Chromosomal aberration; Prenatal BoBs™; Cytogenetic analysis

Cite this article

South African Medical Journal 2015;105(10):870-873. DOI:10.7196/SAMJnew.8121

Article History

Date submitted: 2015-02-18
Date published: 2015-09-19

Article Views

Abstract views: 2237
Full text views: 889

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here