ISSUES IN MEDICINE
Violence, violence prevention, and safety: A research agenda for South Africa
Catherine L Ward, Lillian Artz, Julie Berg, Floretta Boonzaier, Sarah Crawford-Browne, Andrew Dawes, Donald Foster, Richard Matzopoulos, Andrew Nicol, Jeremy Seekings, Arjan B (Sebastian) van As, Elrena van der Spuy
Violence is a serious problem in South Africa with many effects on health services; it presents complex research problems and requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Two key meta-questions emerge: (i) violence must be understood better to develop effective interventions; and (ii) intervention research (evaluating interventions, assessing efficacy and effectiveness, how best to scale up interventions in resource-poor settings) is necessary. A research agenda to address violence is proposed.
S Afr Med J 2012;102:215-218.
All the authors are associated with the Safety and Violence Initiative at the University of Cape Town, and Catherine Ward, Floretta Boonzaier, Andrew Dawes and Donald Foster also with the Department of Psychology; Lillian Artz with the Gender, Health and Justice Research Unit; Julie Berg and Elrena van der Spuy with the Centre of Criminology; Sarah Crawford-Browne with the Primary Health Care Directorate; Richard Matzopoulos with the School of Public Health and Family Medicine, and the Medical Research Council’s Burden of Diseases Research Unit; Andrew Nicol and Sebastian van As with the Department of Surgery; and Jeremy Seekings with the Centre for Social Science Research.
Corresponding author: C L Ward (Catherine.Ward@uct.ac.za)
Interpersonal violence is the leading cause of injury in South Africa, and the homicide rate is over seven times the global average.1 Studies have identified risk factors2 and effective interventions to prevent violence.4 We suggest a research agenda that can support and extend this work, by attending to South Africa’s unique situation.
The ecological model, a standard in public health and violence prevention (Fig. 1), views individuals as nested within interactive systems. Individual characteristics influence risk and protective factors that may increase or decrease the risk of aggression and exposure to violence. Microsystems are where daily interactions shape their behaviour most closely; exosystems comprise contexts that affect the lives of families, their neighbourhoods, extended family systems, and services; and the macrosystem comprises more distal influences such as government policies, norms and ideologies, and the economy.
Individuals and violence
Individuals are considered from two perspectives: factors that affect (i) the likelihood of aggressive behaviour, and (ii) the likelihood of victimisation. In relation to the first, Moffitt suggests a typology of offending: life-course-persistent offenders and adolescence-limited offenders.5 The former start young and continue for life; evidence suggests that neuropsychological deficits (acquired in utero and/or in early childhood) that affect functions such as self-regulation set them on this path, compounded by unsupportive, conflictual parenting.5 The conduct of adolescence-limited offenders is restricted to that developmental period and declines as they mature into adult roles of work and marriage.5
South Africa has high proportions of children exposed to risks for neurological damage in early life: the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders is the highest in the world;6 ,7 22.5% of children aged 1 - 9 years were stunted or wasted;8 and we have high rates of domestic violence and child maltreatment.9 ,10 These can all alter neurochemistry and result in aggression.11 , 12 Such children may have learning disabilities13 that if not identified or adequately addressed may cause them to disconnect from school and increase the possibility of delinquent behaviours.14 Low-cost screening and cost-effective interventions are urgently needed.
A mechanism for reducing harm to others may be the development of a pro-social orientation termed ‘empathy-based guilt’ associated with harmful transgressions.15 Children who learn to attend to the harm caused by an action and have a moral rationale for avoiding such harm are likely to internalise orientations to victims that reduce the probability of aggression. We found no studies of South African children’s capacity for empathy, or of factors that influence its development or its role in aggression. Studies to understand and determine suitable interventions to enhance empathy are urgently needed.
Many young South Africans experience complex transitions to employment and the formation of an independent household, and transition to the social status of adulthood may be extended or never completed.16 The impact of delayed attainment of adulthood on aggression and violent crime, and thereby the larger effect of economic forces (e.g. availability of employment) on individual aggression, should be studied.
Whether violence can be reduced by reducing the vulnerability of potential victims (rather than reducing the aggression of potential perpetrators) should also be explored. Risk for victimisation in South Africa is shaped by context, age and gender: men are more likely to be victims of non-sexual violent crime than women; living in urban environments increases risk;17 youth are at greater risk than adults;9 and young black men are at the greatest risk of homicide.3 Vulnerability is also increased by relative authority or control that the perpetrator has over the victim; low self-esteem or inability to see that victimisation is not warranted;18 lack of personal support structures; mental illness or mental disability;18 , 19 learning disabilities;20 dependence on the perpetrator (material or emotional); exposure to violence as children and violence over a lifetime;21 , 22 , 23 and substance misuse.24 How can people with these vulnerabilities be protected and strengthened?
Families in which parents have warm relationships with their children, provide consistent discipline without being harsh, and supervise adequately are less likely to have aggressive children.25 Where high rates of child maltreatment occur,10 improving parenting must be a priority. Since only about half of South African children live with both biological parents, and even fewer do so consistently through childhood and adolescence,26 this must include all caregivers. Research must develop effective, culturally appropriate parenting interventions that are low in cost and easily available to those who most need them. There are some promising interventions from other contexts, but none has been evaluated here,27 nor have local interventions been evaluated.
Intimate partner violence is prevalent in South Africa.3 We have insufficient knowledge about how to intervene effectively to reduce domestic violence. Locally and internationally there is no clear evidence that men’s violence has been reduced through participation in programmes for batterers.28 , 29 There are some promising local alternatives,30 , 31 but more research in this area is sorely needed.
Schools with clear missions and strong stances against violence have lower rates of bullying.32 However, many South African schools are in disarray,33 and over 50% of children report that corporal punishment is used for discipline, despite its being prohibited.9 This is incongruous with promoting non-violence and pro-social behaviours, and school-based violence prevention programmes and policies must form part of the violence prevention agenda.
Much offending does not occur as a single incident with one offender and one victim; it is much more frequently the case that there is more than one offender (for instance, gang or group violence), or multiple acts of violence by one person, over a period of time, against another person (such as domestic violence or child sexual abuse). However, theories of victimisation and offending frequently fail to consider the cumulative effects of multiple victimisations or chronic offending over a lifetime.34
Gangs, one form of a violent peer group, are a feature in South African violence. There are many international studies into effective policing and models for detaching young people from gangs,35 but there is little local research into effective interventions.
Agendas to prevent young people from joining gangs and engaging in delinquency must include pro-social leisure opportunities after school. These can be effective in reducing many risk behaviours, but their mechanisms are little understood and this too needs investigation.36
Children’s caregivers cannot do parenting in isolation, and their effective parenting is influenced by available social support. For poor parents in particular, this often means support in their neighbourhoods.37 How neighbourhood quality can be improved to better support parenting and the influence of family and neighbourhood characteristics on the development of antisocial behaviour among South African children is also poorly understood. For instance, how do South African children draw on available support to negotiate safety in unsafe families or neighbourhoods?38 Understanding these inter-relationships can assist in developing better interventions.
Strong neighbouring relationships may influence rates of crime, e.g. by not tolerating groups of young people ‘hanging out’ on corners.39 However, how can neighbourhood crime prevention be strengthened without encouraging vigilantism?40 This must include work on police-community relations, and how these affect crime and violence at the local level.41 Neighbourhood-level data on violence are key to such research. The South African Police Service must recognise this and make their data available.
Patterns of violence within communities often differ, e.g. within low-income, high-violence neighbourhoods the victims frequently know the perpetrators,4 2 unlike in affluent communities. What causes this, and what would be effective interventions for different forms of violence? Policing strategies, tailored to meet the challenges of specific communities, must be documented and evaluated.43
Those affected by violence are at risk of related psychological and social costs and of secondary victimisation from the criminal justice and health systems and society.4 4 This may lead to problems such as post-traumatic stress, substance abuse and aggressive responses. The latter make effective services for victims an important part of violence prevention. How can medical and psychological services best be provided? Evidence suggests that recovery from a traumatic experience requires physical or psychological safety.45 As many South Africans live under continuous threat, it is important to investigate alternative pathways to recovery.
Health services are obvious places to screen for and provide services to reduce aggression, including interventions for substance misuse; promoting maternal health; improving parenting; reducing intimate partner violence; and early detection of child mental health problems associated with aggression. It is critical to investigate whether the state has the capacity to carry out this screening and intervention.
The health system can provide surveillance systems that assess the extent of violence, which are crucial to monitor interventions and to determine their efficacy. The National Injury Mortality Surveillance System (NIMSS) has an important role,1 but many injuries do not result in death, and until a comprehensive injury surveillance system is established, part of the picture will be missing. Establishing a system that is simple to administer is an important area for research and for implementation.
Under Apartheid, public order policing was associated with use of force.46 Since the setting up of constitutional democracy the right to participate in public demonstrations has been liberalised, the role of the police circumscribed and the principle of minimum force professed.47 However, in the context of increased service delivery protests, police action has become less restrained, suggesting the need for vigilance to ensure application of their principles for strengthening rather than diluting the search for peaceful coexistence.48
Clarification is required regarding the roles of the state (e.g. police) and of non-state entities (e.g. private security companies, street committees) in the governance of violence and crime. The non-state is actively involved in governing crime, sometimes duplicating the state and participating in activities beyond what are expected of the state.41 , 49 More research must map the range of policing-type functions of non-state entities, and investigate the type of non-state/state collaborations and the effects on (un)safety. Normative questions also arise such as who the state (police) should be in relation to the increasing plurality of policing entities and how to regulate and hold to account new configurations of state/non-state governance while ensuring their effective contribution to decrease crime and unsafety.52 , 53
Studies have implicated media violence54 and values of sexism and materialism55 , 56 portrayed in various media as playing a role in driving violence. Yet their mechanisms are poorly understood, and whether these relationships hold in the high-violence areas of South Africa requires investigation.
Social norms around violence
Despite overviews according importance to a ‘culture of violence’, the role of norms has been neglected in violence studies in South Africa.57 , 58 But there is little empirical basis for these claims, in contrast with the study of violence elsewhere.4 Cultural and social norms may be divided into two categories: (i) violence is deemed legitimate by higher-status individuals (especially men) against lower-status individuals (such as children or women);10 and (ii) the general attitude towards violence in society might consider violence legitimate to resolve disputes or conflicts. Norms may influence violence through shaping the behaviour of possible perpetrators or the behaviour of others present in situations that are conducive to violence, and whose complicity or opposition to the use of violence might serve as fuel or constraint. Investigating norms around violence in South Africa will help in understanding and intervening in relationships between the psychologies of masculinity and femininity, the sociology of opportunity, and the perpetration of violence.
Evidence suggests that violence occurs at higher rates in societies with high levels of economic inequality.59 Investigation is needed into whether this holds in South Africa, where violence seems to have increased alongside an increase in inequality, high unemployment and income poverty.60 In high-income countries the relationship between inequality and violence appears to be driven by concerns about status and social exclusion, but there is no strong evidence for this here.
There are a number of polices in place in South Africa that are intended to deal directly with violence, e.g. the Children’s Act No. 38 of 2005, the Domestic Violence Act No. 116 of 1998, the Sexual Offences Act No. 32 of 2007, and the Victim Empowerment Policy. The links between government, civil society and community-based organisations must be evaluated. This might encompass economic research investigating the human and financial resources to give effect to them, evaluations of existing programmes (do they reach those in need and provide effective services?), and implementation research on providing potentially large-scale programmes.
Some policies may indirectly affect violence. For instance, government policy is turning towards controlling the availability of alcohol to reduce violence and injuries. Research into understanding the relationship between alcohol and violence, which will drive an appropriate, integrated and comprehensive alcohol policy, is desperately needed. Similarly, careful thought must be given to the control and policing of illegal substances, as the illicit economy is a driver of violence. Evidence suggests that law enforcement interventions to disrupt drug markets are unlikely to reduce drug-related violence and instead result in higher gun violence and higher homicide rates.61 Another government policy needing ongoing monitoring and evaluation is the Firearms Control Act (No. 60 of 2000). Since its implementation in 2004, firearm-related deaths have decreased, but whether this is clearly linked to the new policy needs further investigation.
This is a complex research agenda, within which are strands that might be considered ‘meta-questions’ that cannot rely solely on health professionals. Health professionals from several specialties all have a role to play in carrying out a comprehensive research agenda for violence prevention in South Africa. But the complex research problems that violence presents demand inter-disciplinary collaboration by the full range of social and human scientists: economists, educationalists, psychologists, sociologists, anthropologists, etc. Only in working together can these problems be sufficiently well understood and effective interventions developed.
Research to understand violence better might take several forms, e.g. understanding ‘norms’ of violence and how they link several drivers of violence, or understanding factors that influence child development for good or for ill. Intervention research may evaluate interventions and assess efficacy and effectiveness; and once effectiveness has been established, understanding how the intervention might be scaled up and retain that effectiveness. Related questions concern effective implementation of programmes in our poorly resourced settings, e.g. nurse home visitation programmes for the first 2 years of life in the USA reduce later youth violence, but rely on trained, expensive nurses.62 Can such programmes retain their effectiveness if community health workers are employed instead of nurses?
This paper therefore lays out a comprehensive agenda for understanding violence and promoting safety in South Africa. There are many questions about violence that are as yet unanswered, and there are key roles for many different disciplines in answering them.
Author note. This paper grew out of discussions among the authors.
C Ward led the discussions and writing of the paper; all others contributed equally, and authorship is given in alphabetical order to reflect the equality of contribution.
Financial support. The University of Cape Town’s Vice-Chancellor’s Strategic Fund.
Conflicts of interest. All authors confirm no potential conflicts of interest.
1. Norman R, Matzopoulos R, Groenewald P, Bradshaw D. The high burden of injuries in South Africa. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:695-702. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862007000900015]
2. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. Tackling Armed Violence: Key Findings and Recommendations of the Study on the Violent Nature of Crime in South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, 2010.
3. Seedat M, Van Niekerk A, Jewkes R, Suffla S, Ratele K. Violence and injuries in South Africa: prioritising an agenda for prevention. Lancet 2009;374:1011-1022. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60948-X]
4. World Health Organization. Violence Prevention: The Evidence. Geneva: WHO, 2009. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/4th_milestones_meeting/publications/en/index.html (accessed 7 August 2011).
5. Moffitt TE. Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 1993;100:674-701. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674]
6. McKinstry J. Using the past to step forward: Fetal alcohol syndrome in the Western Cape province of South Africa. American Journal of Public Health 2005;95:1097-1099. [doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.056366]
7. Rosenthal J, Christianson A, Cordero J. Fetal alcohol syndrome prevention in South Africa and other low-resource countries. American Journal of Public Health 2005;95:1099-1101. [http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.057372]
8. Hendricks M, Bourne L. An integrated approach to malnutrition in childhood. In: Kibel M, Lake L, Pendlebury P, Smith C, eds. South African Child Gauge 2009/2010. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town, 2010:46-52.
9. Leoschut L, Burton P, How Rich the Rewards? Results of the 2005 National Youth Victimisation Study. Cape Town: Centre for Justice and Crime Prevention, 2006.
10. Richter L, Dawes A, deKadt J. Early childhood. In: Petersen I, Bhana A, Swartz L, Flisher A, Richter L, eds. Promoting Mental Health in Scarce Resource Contexts: Emerging Evidence and Practice. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2010:99-123.
11. Liu J, Raine A. The effect of childhood malnutrition on externalising behaviour. Curr Opin Pediatr 2006;18:565-570. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mop.0000245360.13949.91]
12. Shonkoff J. Building a new biodevelopmental framework to guide the future of early childhood policy. Child Dev 2010;81:357-367. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01399.x]
13. Kavale KA. Learning disability and cultural-economic disadvantage: The case for a relationship. Learning Disability Quarterly 1988;11:195-210.
14. Catalano RF, Hawkins JD. The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In Hawkins JD, ed. Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1996:198-235.
15. Hoffman ML. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
16. Seekings J. Entry into the Labour Market. Report for the Centre for Development and Enterprise. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, 2011.
17. Williams S, Williams D, Stein D, Seedat S, Jackson P, Moolmal H. Multiple traumatic events and psychological distress: The South African Stress and Health Study. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2007;20(5):845-855. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jts.20252]
18. Miller DT, Porter CA. Self-blame in victims of violence. Journal of Social Issues 1983;39:139-152. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1983.tb00145.x]
19. Heidi LS. Interaction between family violence and mental retardation. Mental Retardation 2001;39:461-471. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2001)039<0461:IBFVAM>2.0.CO;2]
20. Hickson IK, Golden H, Chatzistyli A. Profiles of women who have mental retardation with and without a documented history of abuse. American Journal on Mental Retardation 2008;113:133-142. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[133:POWWHM]2.0.CO;2]
21. Shu-Man P. Prevalence of sexual abuse of people with intellectual disabilities in Taiwan. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2003;45:373-379. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[373:POSAOP]2.0.CO;2 ]
22. Finkelhor D. Childhood Victimization: Violence, Crime, and Abuse in the Lives of Young People. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
23. Finkelhor D, Ormrod RK, Turner HA, Hamby SL. Measuring poly-victimization using the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire. Child Abuse & Neglect 2005;29:1297-1312. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.06.005]
24. King G, Flisher AJ, Noubary F, Reece R, Marais A, Lombard C. Substance abuse and behavioral correlates of sexual assault among South African adolescents. Child Abuse & Neglect 2004;28:683-696. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.12.003]
25. Farrington DP, Welsh BC. Saving Children From a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
26. Rothbaum F, Weisz JR. Parental caregiving and child externalising behaviour in nonclinical samples: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1994;116:55-74. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.55]
27. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Compilation of evidence-based family skills training programmes. Vienna: UNODC, 2009. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/prevention/familyskillstraining.html (accessed 18 December 2011).
28. Babcock JC, Green CE, Robie C. Does batterer’s treatment work? A meta-analytic view of domestic violence treatment. Clin Psychol Rev 2004;23:1023-1053. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001]
29. Dutton DG, Corvo K. The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2007;12:658-667. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2007.03.002]
30. Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 2006;368:1973-1983. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69744-4]
31. Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, et al. Impact of Stepping Stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;337:a506. [http://dx.doi.org:10:1136/bmja.506].
32. Masten AS, Coastworth JD. The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. Am Psychol 1998;53:205-220. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.205]
33. Chisholm L. The state of South Africa’s schools. In: Daniel J, Southall R, Lutchman J, eds. State of the Nation: South Africa 2004-2005. Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2004:177-189.
34. Flavin J, Artz L. Understanding women, gender, and crime: Historical and international developments. In: Renzetti C, Miller S, Gover A, eds. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Crime Studies. Oxford: Routledge (in press).
35. Cooper A, Ward CL. Intervening with youth in gangs. In: Ward CL, Van der Merwe A, Dawes A, eds. Youth Violence in South Africa: Sources and Solutions. Cape Town: UCT Press, 2012: 241-274.
36. Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Pachan M. A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 2010;45:294-309. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9300-6]
37. Garbarino J, Sherman D. High-risk neighborhoods and high-risk families: the human ecology of child maltreatment. Child Dev 1980;51:188-198.
38. Bray R, Gooskens I, Kahn L, Moses S, Seekings J. Growing Up in the New South Africa: Childhood and Adolescence in Post-Apartheid Cape Town. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council, 2010.
39. Sampson RJ, Groves WB. Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. AJS 1989;94:774-802.
40. Seekings J, Jooste, T, Muyeba S, Coqui M, Russell M. The Social Consequences of Establishing Mixed Neighbourhoods. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, 2010. http://www.cssr.uct.ac.za/publications/research-report/2010/667 (accessed 18 December 2011).
41. Marks M, Wood J. The South African policing ‘nexus’: Charting the policing landscape in Durban. South African Review of Sociology 2007;38:134-160. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2007.10419172]
42. Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. The violent nature of crime in South Africa – a concept paper for the Justice, Crime Prevention and Security Cluster. A report to the Justice, Crime Prevention and Security Cluster of the South African Parliament. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, 2007. http://www.info.gov.za/issues/crime/violent_crime.pdf (accessed 7 March 2011).
43. Dixon B, Rauch J. Sector policing: Origins and prospects. ISS Monograph No. 97. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies, 2004. http://www.iss.co.za/pubs/Monographs/No97/Contents.html (accessed 18 December 2011).
44. United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention. Handbook on Justice for Victims. United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention. New York: Centre for International Crime Prevention, 1999.
45. Foa EB, Keane TM, Friedman MJ, Cohen JA, eds. Effective Treatments for PTSD: Practice Guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. New York: Guilford Press, 2009.
46. Cawthra G. Policing South Africa: The SAP and the Transition from Apartheid. London: Zed Books, 1993.
47. Shearing C, Foster D. Back to the future in South African security: from intentions to effective mechanisms. In: Van der Spuy E, Parmentier S, Dissel A, eds. Restorative Justice: Politics, Policies and Prospects. Cape Town: Juta, 2007.
48. Tait S, Marks M. You strike a gathering, you strike a rock: Current debates in the policing of public order in South Africa. SA Crime Quarterly 2011;38:15-22.
49. Berg J. Seeing like private security: Evolving mentalities of public space protection in South Africa. Criminology and Criminal Justice 2010;10:287-301. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1748895810370315]
50. Minnaar A. Inaugural Lecture: Private-Public Partnerships: Private Security, Crime Prevention and Policing in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Security Risk Management, School of Criminal Justice, College of Law, University of South Africa, 2004. http://www.unisa.ac.za/contents/docs/inaugural.pdf (accessed 6 March 2012).
51. Schärf W, Nina D, eds. The Other Law: Non-state Ordering in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta, 2001.
52. Shearing C, Marks M. Being a new police in the liquid 21st century. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 2011;5:1-9. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/police/par035]
53. Lewis C, Wood J. The governance of policing and security provision. In Fleming J, Wood J, eds. Fighting Crime Together: Challenges of Policing and Security Networks. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 2006.
54. Anderson C, Bushman B. Media violence and the American public revisited. Am Psychol 2002;57:448-450. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.6-7.448]
55. Jiwani Y. Discourses of Denial: Mediations of Race, Gender and Violence. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2006.
56. Hennigan KM, Del Rosario ML, Heath L, Cook TD, Wharton JD, Calder BJ. Impact of the introduction of television on crime in the United States: empirical findings and theoretical implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982;42:461-477. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2061]
57. Pelser E. Learning to be lost: Youth crime in South Africa. Discussion paper for the HSRC Youth Policy Initiative, Reserve Bank, Pretoria (13 May 2008). http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Document-2774.phtml (accessed 6 March 2012).
58. Altbeker A. Adding Insult to Injury: How Exclusion and Inequality Drive South Africa’s Problem of Violence. Report #4 of CSVR Study of Violent Crime. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, 2008.
59. Wilkinson R, Pickett K. The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin, 2010.
60. Seekings J, Thaler K. Socio-economic Conditions, Young Men and Violence in Cape Town. CSSR Working Paper No. 285. Cape Town: Centre for Social Science Research, University of Cape Town, 2010.
61. Werb D, Rowell G, Guyatt G, Kerr T, Montaner J, Wood E. Effect of drug law enforcement on drug market violence: A systematic review. International Journal of Drug Policy 2011;22:87-94. [http://dx.doi.org:10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.02.002]
62. Olds DL, Robinson J, O’Brien R, et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2002;110:486-496. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.3.486]
Full text views: 16222